Friday, October 12, 2018

Committee tells candidates they should consciously avoid campaigning that may mislead voters

The committee received a complaint in early October from a judicial candidate, alleging misleading campaigning by the other candidate in the race.

One concern expressed was that the other candidate's claim of a certain amount of “legal experience” included time in law-related activities before admission to the bar. The other concern was that the lack of the words “vote” or “elect” on some campaign materials with the title of the office being sought may create the incorrect impression that the candidate already holds that office.

Some committee members were concerned about one issue, others were concerned about the other, and some were concerned about both, but there was no overall consensus among the committee members. The committee did not feel that the matter called for a press release, but told the candidates in a letter that its main concern is that judicial candidates consciously avoid campaigning that may mislead voters.

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Most judicial candidates on May 22 primary ballots sign committee's proffered pledge to campaign fairly

Each election year the Committee asks judicial candidates to sign a pledge that they will conduct their campaigns in accordance with the Kentucky Code of Judicial Conduct, and disavow advertising that uses false or misleading information that impugns the integrity of a candidate or the judicial system, or that erodes public trust and confident in the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.

Most of the candidates who are opposed in the May 22 primary have signed the pledge. Primaries are held in judicial races with three or more candidates, sending the top two vote-getters to the Nov. 6 general election. The primary-ballot candidates signing the pledge are listed below, with the number of candidates in the race if more than three. This list has been updated since the original April 26 posting, and will continue to be updated if more candidates on primary ballots submit agreements. Candidates who do NOT appear on the primary ballot are not listed; this list will be updated for the general election.

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, Third District
Debra Hembree Lambert, Burnside
David Tapp, Somerset
JUDGE OF THE COURT of APPEALS, Seventh District, unexpired term (six candidates)
David Barber, Morehead
Kevin Sinnette, Ashland
Gene Smallwood, Whitesburg
Larry Thompson, Pikeville
CIRCUIT JUDGE, Family Court, unexpired term, 16th Circuit, 5th Division
Pete Roush, Covington
Terri King Schoborg, Covington
CIRCUIT JUDGE, Family Court, unexpired term, 22nd Circuit, 1st Division (four candidates)
Gregory Napier, Lexington
Nam Nguyen, Lexington
Eileen O'Brien, Lexington
CIRCUIT JUDGE, Family Court, unexpired term, 30th Circuit, 4th Division (four candidates)
Bryan Gatewood, Fisherville
Lauren Adams Ogden, Louisville
Shelley Santry, Louisville
DISTRICT JUDGE
6th District, 3rd Division
Daniel M. "Nick" Burlew, Owensboro
Misty Miller, Maceo
11th District, 2nd Division (five candidates)
Jude Hagan, Lebanon
Dawn McCauley, Lebanon
Jeremy Ancil Wood, Campbellsville
30th District, 3rd Division
Tracy Davis, Louisville
Jim Green, Prospect
30th District, 6th Division
Sean Delahanty, Louisville
Alex Gaddis, Louisville
30th District, 9th Division (four candidates)
Danny Alvarez, Louisville
Andre Bergeron, Louisville
Karen Faulkner, Louisville
33rd District (six candidates)
B. Cody Goehring, Hazard
Becky Williams Patterson, Hazard
Teresa Combs Reed, Hazard
Sheila Clemons Stoffel, Hazard
35th District, 1st Division (four candidates)
Joe Jett Friend, Pikeville
Amber Hunt Sisco, Pikeville
Robert F. Wright, Pikeville
35th District, 2nd Division (five candidates)
Tommy Chamberlin, Pikeville
Andrew Tyler Friend, Pikeville
Justin Cory Hamilton, Pikeville
39th District
Billy Oliver, Campton
Jarett Rose, Stanton
51st District, 2nd Division (four candidates)
David Curlin, Henderson
Leslie Newman, Henderson
Greg Sutton, Henderson
54th District, Division 2
Angela Greene, Union
Marcia Thomas, Petersburg

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Committee receives complaint, gets response and prompt correction from target of complaint

The committee received a complaint from a judicial candidate alleging that another candidate in a race misrepresented the latter candidate’s qualifications by describing the race as if the complainant was not in it. The candidate who was the object of the complaint, soon after being notified of the complaint, acknowledged his error and corrected his online postings. Both candidates were among those who had already signed an agreement with the committee pledging to avoid misleading voters.

Monday, February 19, 2018

Committee reorganizes for 2018, which may be busy

The Kentucky Judicial Campaign Conduct Committee has elected new officers for 2018, a year that could be a busy one for the committee, with more than 200 candidates for Kentucky judgeships.

Judge Anthony Wilhoit
The new chair and president of the Committee is former Kentucky Court of Appeals Judge Anthony Wilhoit, who has served as vice chair and chair in the past. He succeeds Kate Hendrickson of Maysville, who remains on the Committee. Cecile Schubert of Richmond and Al Cross of Frankfort were re-elected vice chair and secretary, respectively. Retired Judge Charles Boteler, a former chair who now lives in Louisville, was elected treasurer. He succeeds Jon Fleischaker of Louisivlle, who remains on the Committee.

Following an internal review, the committee will soon send letters to judicial candidates asking them to sign an agreement regarding their campaign activities, as it has in the past. Names of those signing the agreement will be publicized. For judgeships with more than two candidates, primary elections on May 22 will reduce the fields to the top two vote-getters.

For a list of Kentucky judicial candidate filings, click here. This list includes candidates for commonwealth's attorney in multi-county districts, who file with the secretary of state. Those races are partisan and not part of the committee's purview; all races for judgeships are nonpartisan, making them fundamentally different from elections for legislative and executive positions.